Monte Carlo Simulation Planning
The MICA Network is sourcing Monte Carlo simulation solutions to support a member processing operation. The goal is to move from disorganized, reactive problem solving toward a strategic, planned approach for improving processing plant efficiency.
Core Objective
- The objective of this initiative is to transition from fragmented, reactive bottleneck management to a strategic, methodical framework for processing plant optimization.
- We aim to leverage a dynamic simulator driven by Monte Carlo statistical simulation to identify, analyze, and prioritize processing plant constraints at a high level.
- The ultimate financial and operational goals are to decrease cost per ton and increase overall recovery.
The Plan
The proposed solution involves a two-step technical approach to model the processing environment:
- Dynamic Digitization of P&IDs: Converting Piping and Instrumentation Diagrams (P&IDs) into a dynamic, functional digital format that maps the logic and flow of the processing plant.
- Layered Monte Carlo Simulation: Applying Monte Carlo statistical simulation tools directly on top of the digitized P&IDs to introduce variability (e.g., uptime, feed grade, equipment reliability) and expose systemic bottlenecks.
Key Boundary
- Not a real-time system or a full digital twin.
- Not intended to track every piece of equipment or replicate every sensor point.
- Built for statistical probability analysis and macro-constraint identification.
Market Review
- Established simulation software remains under review.
- Newer tools are also being evaluated for better fit with high-level risk modeling.
- Vendor approaches may differ in how they digitize plant logic and represent uncertainty.
Questions for Experts
We are looking for expert feedback on the following:
- Is our proposed method of combining the digital map with the statistical modeling a practical and standard way to approach this type of high-level planning?
- Are there newer software platforms or vendors particularly good at statistical risk modeling that we should consider?
- Does our definition of "high-level" planning provide enough clarity, or do we need to set clearer limits on the amount of detail required (e.g., how much storage space there is, or how often equipment breaks down)?
Challenge Specifics
Open date
June 9, 2026
Submission close
October 1, 2026
Contact
Lorelei Ratushniak, Director of Mine Relations, MICA
lratushniak@cemi.ca
Delivery model
High-level planning and prioritization
Primary method
Monte Carlo simulation
Placeholder for additional operational details, site constraints, or data assumptions that are still being finalized.
